Legal Opinion

Frost v. O'Kross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This cause comes into this court on error from the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county, wherein the parties stood in inverse order. The plaintiff, Mary O’Kross, recovered a judgment in the sum of $3,500 against the defendant, Edward J. Frost, as damages for malicious prosecution. The affidavit of arrest charged the obtaining of money or property -by false pretense, and it is argued that the prosecution ought to have been under the statutes with respect to what is known as the Blue Sky Law, Section 6373-1 et seq., General Code. The defense to the malicious prosecution action was that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sandoz v. VeazieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Johnson v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Moore v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Gilbertson v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Van Meter v. BassSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pokorny v. Local 310Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. John A. Pergola v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Garrett v. Fisher Titus HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Hopson v. AndrewsCity of Columbus Municipal Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API