Legal Opinion

Hopson v. Andrews

City of Columbus Municipal Court

Decided August 12, 1963No. 151201Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchwarzwalder, J.

The ‘ ‘ Supplemental and Amended Petition” filed by the plaintiff on January 2, 1963, contains two causes of action. The first cause of action alleges that the defendant did “speak # * say of and concerning the plaintiff and publish ‘certain’ false, malicious and defamatory words.”

The Court finds from a consideration of all the evidence that the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proof as to the first cause of action. First cause of action is dismissed.

In his second cause of action the plaintiff incorporated all allegations of facts set forth in the first cause of action, and in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frost v. O'KrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API