Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh National Bank v. Welton Becket Associates

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

Presently before us are the Rule 12 motions of Defendant, Turner Construction Company (“Turner”), attacking the complaint filed by Plaintiff, Pittsburgh National Bank (“PNB”) in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and removed to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Turner’s motions include a motion to strike, a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and a motion for a more definite statement.

The underlying action arises out of alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ambrogi v. Gould, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Reilly v. Gould, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hayden Business Center Condominiums Ass'n v. Pegasus Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Columbus, Cuneo, Cabrini Medical Center v. Holiday InnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Moyer v. White, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API