Legal Opinion

Blair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided June 28, 2013No. Case No. 4:12-cv-1776-JEOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN E. OTT, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

In this action originally filed in state court, Plaintiff Sharon Blair brings a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging that her Long Term Disability (“LTD”) benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan were wrongfully terminated. (Doc.1 1-1 at 3-4 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”)). Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), the plan’s claims administra*1232tor, removed the action to this court. (Doc. 1). The case was assigned to the undersigned…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Till v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. Madison v. Greater Georgia Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  3. Smith v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  4. Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  5. Waters v. AIG Claims, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API