Blair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN E. OTT, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
In this action originally filed in state court, Plaintiff Sharon Blair brings a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging that her Long Term Disability (“LTD”) benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan were wrongfully terminated. (Doc.1 1-1 at 3-4 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”)). Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), the plan’s claims administra*1232tor, removed the action to this court. (Doc. 1). The case was assigned to the undersigned…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Till v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Madison v. Greater Georgia Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Smith v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
- Waters v. AIG Claims, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022