Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 6, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01423Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CAROL H. STEWART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:17-CV-01423-KOB ) HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Carol Stewart, like many American workers, participated in an employee-benefit plan that her former employer, the law firm of Burr & Forman, LLP, sponsors. Defendant Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company administers claims and pays benefits under the plan, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs the plan.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Ted Herring v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API