Stewart v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CAROL H. STEWART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:17-CV-01423-KOB ) HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Carol Stewart, like many American workers, participated in an employee-benefit plan that her former employer, the law firm of Burr & Forman, LLP, sponsors. Defendant Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company administers claims and pays benefits under the plan, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs the plan.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ted Herring v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.