Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Leiber

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 30, 1964No. 3195Published

1Opinion of the Court

Spaeth, J.,

On April 17, 1964, plaintiff, Lee 'Gordon, filed a complaint in trespass, alleging that defendant, Harry Leiber, through his agent, servant, or employe, improperly applied dye to her scalp and hair, failed to give her a patch test before applying the dye, failed to supervise “said treatment,” violated “various statutes . . . and ordinances . . . pertaining to the operation of beauty shops,” created and failed to warn her of a dangerous condition, and failed to use due care under the circumstances. As a result, plaintiff alleges, some of her hair has fallen out, and she has suffered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Prost v. Caldwell Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Wnek v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Jones v. WohlgemuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API