Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Fierro

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1991No. S004726. Crim. No. 25699Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

The Eighth Amendment to the federal Constitution does not bar consideration of a victim’s personal characteristics to determine penalty in a capital case, but evidence and argument on this subject must be authorized by statute. Penal Code section 190.3 (hereafter section 190.3), a part of our voter-enacted death penalty law, lists those matters that the trier of penalty “shall consider” in deciding whether to return a verdict of death. In People v. Edwards (1991) 54 Cal.3d 787 [1 Cal.Rptr.2d 696, 819 P.2d 436], this court purported to hold that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API