Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Ramsay
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 10, 1999No. Civ. L-98-1585PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. The parties have thoroughly briefed the issues, and the Court finds that a hearing will not be necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1997). For the reasons stated herein, the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be, by separate Order, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Background
The plaintiff, Rob Farmer, a white male, filed this action against the University of Maryland at Baltimore (“UMB”), the University of Maryland School of Medicine (“UMSM”), and three officials of the two institutions. 1 The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Rodgers v. University of Missouri Board of CuratorsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Hodge v. College of Southern MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.