Burgdorfer Electric Co. v. Voyles Construction Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
This mechanic’s lien case hinges on two issues: In proving a contract, may a party rely on his adversary’s testimony of the agreed amount when that amount differs from his own testimony? And, is the dismissal of an original petition res judicata when the court does not then give plaintiff leave to amend?
Plaintiff (Burgdorfer), an electrical contracting company, got an $8,000 verdict and judgment against the corporate builder (Voyles) for work and materials Burgdor-fer furnished in Voyles’ construction of an apartment building. Voyles appeals. We affirm. On a preliminary…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- White v. SieversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Meffert v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Miller v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California & Hawaiian Sugar Company v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- First National Bank of Colorado Springs v. Mark IV Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hamra v. Boone County Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1978