Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Cons. v. Planning Zoning Comm., No. 557775 (Aug. 28, 2002)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 28, 2002No. 557775Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
STATEMENT OF APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the defendant, New London planning zoning commission (commission), approving an application of the defendant, Corcoran Jennison Company (Corcoran), to amend the New London zoning regulations and zoning map. The plaintiffs, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC (Conservancy), Amy Hallquist and Stephen Hallquist, bring this appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 8-8, § 22a-19 and § 22a-20.
BACKGROUND
In October of 1999, the New London Development Corporation (NLDC), a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.