Legal Opinion
Monarch Cortland v. Columbia Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 22, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
Defendant agreed to defend plaintiff in a personal injury action brought by William Simmons against plaintiff and others in Massachusetts (see, Simmons v Monarch Mach. Tool Co., 413 Mass 205, 596 NE2d 318). The injuries to Simmons resulted from a tool change operation that involved products manufactured and supplied by plaintiff. The comprehensive casualty policy issued by defendant had limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury and property damage. In the course of its defense of plaintiff, it appears that defendant rejected…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Simmons v. Monarch MacHine Tool Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Agriculver Profit Sharing Plan v. Dryden Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Soundview Associates v. New Hampshire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- New England Insurance v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- AAA Sprinkler Corp. v. General Star National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Hanover Ins Co v. Media FactoryVermont Superior Court · 2026
- Shaya B. Pacific, LLC v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- United States Fire Insurance v. American National Fire Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.