Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shaya B. Pacific, LLC v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2006Published

1Dissent

Lifson, J. (dissenting).

The issue presented is fairly narrow: Did the complaint set forth sufficient facts to sustain a viable cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice or, alternatively, whether the cause of action should have been summarily dismissed based on the documentary proof submitted. Because I believe that the majority would impose a duty on lawyers that has heretofore not been recognized by any court in this state, I respectfully dissent. Moreover, I note that the plaintiffs proof was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion.

The complaint herein asserts that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Darby & Darby, P. C. v. VSI International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Power Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Heydt Contracting Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Tortura v. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API