Shaya B. Pacific, LLC v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Lifson, J. (dissenting).
The issue presented is fairly narrow: Did the complaint set forth sufficient facts to sustain a viable cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice or, alternatively, whether the cause of action should have been summarily dismissed based on the documentary proof submitted. Because I believe that the majority would impose a duty on lawyers that has heretofore not been recognized by any court in this state, I respectfully dissent. Moreover, I note that the plaintiffs proof was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion.
The complaint herein asserts that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Darby & Darby, P. C. v. VSI International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Power Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Heydt Contracting Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Tortura v. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.