Legal Opinion

Hobby v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 31, 2011No. CA 11-131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG MARTIN, Judge.

| íAppellant Brooke Hobby appeals from the circuit court’s order denying her motion for a change of custody. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not clearly err in finding that Brooke failed to demonstrate the existence of a material change in circumstances, we affirm.

Brooke and appellee Tommy Walker are the parents of a daughter, G.W., although Brooke and Tommy were never married. G.W. was fourteen years old at the time of the hearing on Brooke’s motion. According to Brooke, the couple shared joint custody of G.W. until 2008, when the Saline County Circuit Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodall v. Chuck Dory Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Stehle v. ZimmerebnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Stacks v. StacksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  2. McCoy v. KincadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. McCoy v. KincadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Sisson v. SissonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API