Legal Opinion
Woodall v. Chuck Dory Auto Sales, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 13, 2001No. 01-659PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R OBERT L. Brown, Justice.
Appellants Mike Woodall and Mike Woodall Auto Sales, Inc. (Woodall), appeal from a judgment which memorializes a directed verdict in favor of appellee Chuck Dory Auto Sales, Inc. (Dory), and awards Dory damages for a counterclaim in the amount of $102,230. Woodall’s one point on appeal concerns whether the circuit judge erred in granting a directed verdict in favor of Dory, when the loans at issue carried with them a usurious interest rate. We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
On December 15, 1998, Woodall filed a complaint, which was followed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Winston v. Personal Finance Co. of Pine Bluff, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Morehart v. Dillard Department StoresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Lytle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Swink v. GiffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- FMC CORPORATION, INC. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Curry v. ThornsberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Mangrum v. PigueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.