Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1964No. App. No. 58PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency attacks the constitutionality of the Act on several grounds. His contentions are all answered by prior decisions of this Court. See Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Meredith v. Director, 226 Md. 653; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; McDonogh v. Director, 229 Md. 626; Williams v. Director, 232 Md. 632. Robinson v. California, 370 U. S. 660, relied on by the applicant is clearly distinguishable on the facts.

Application denied.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Meredith v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API