Legal Opinion

Bahr v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1994No. 19A01-9312-CR-00388PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

William H. Bahr appeals the revocation of his probation. Bahr's probation was revoked because he had failed to pay restitution as required under the terms of his probation. He raises one issue on appeal. Restated it is:

whether the revocation of Bahr's probation for his failure to pay restitution denied him the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

We affirm.

FACTS

Bahr sold securities representing interests in oil wells. However, he had not been registered to sell such securities as required by Ind.Code 23-2-1-1. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dulin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Gilfillen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Monroe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M.L. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Champlain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morgan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Garrett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Szpunar v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API