Legal Opinion
M.L. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 2005No. 49A04-0504-JV-202PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Ju‘dge.
Case Summary
M.L. appeals the juvenile court's restitution order, arguing that the court denied him due process of law by failing to inquire into his ability to pay before ordering restitution as a condition of his probation. Finding that the court was required to make such an inquiry and that it failed to do so, we vacate the restitution order and remand with instructions for the court to inquire into M.L.'s ability to pay.
Facts and Procedural History
Thirteen-year-old ML. received from a friend a vehicle that had been stolen from Patty Parton. ML., who did not have a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- J.P.B. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bahr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by22 opinions
- S.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- T.C. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- J.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Carlin Iltzsch v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- P.J. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.