Legal Opinion

Alexandria Mining & Exploring Co. v. Painter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1891No. 88PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The complaint in this action is as follows: “ The plaintiffs, Alfred M. Painter and Samantha Painter, *588complain of the defendants, Alexandria Mining and Exploring Company, Samuel E. Young, Joseph J. Pickard, Arthur E. Harlan, and Edward B. Chamness, and say: That on the 19th day of November, 1887, the plaintiffs were the owners in fee of the following real estate in Madison county, in the State of Indiana, to wit: Lot No. 6 (six), in the town of Alexandria, on which was situated a dwelling-house of the value of $1,200; that on said day, and for a longtime prior thereto, the defendants, under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. City of Columbus v. StrassnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. City of Elkhart v. WitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Inter State Motor Freight System v. HenryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Adams v. MainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Brehm v. HenningsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API