City of Columbus v. Strassner
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.
This is an action instituted by the appellee against the appellant for damages.
The complaint contains two paragraphs. To each paragraph a demurrer was filed.
The court overruled the demurrers, and exceptions were reserved.
An answer in general denial was filed by the appellant. The cause was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict for the appellee, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict of the jury.
The errors assigned are as follows :
1. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the first paragraph of the complaint.
2. The court erred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Town of Gosport v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ivory v. . Town of DeerparkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- City of Logansport v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- City of Plymouth v. MilnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Cintrón Adorno v. GómezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- McAlister v. CarlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.