Legal Opinion

Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Glover

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court-; John B. Martineau, Chancellor; E. D. Glover brought suit against Road Improvement District No. 1 of Pulaski County, against Charles E. Heckler, E. Kanis and Adam C. Penzel as directors of said -district, against the collector' of taxes of Pulaski County, and against the Hydraulic Sand & Stone Company, alleging that certain landowners of Pulaski County filed their petition in the county court of said county under the act approved March 4,…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court-; John B. Martineau, Chancellor; E. D. Glover brought suit against Road Improvement District No. 1 of Pulaski County, against Charles E. Heckler, E. Kanis and Adam C. Penzel as directors of said -district, against the collector' of taxes of Pulaski County, and against the Hydraulic Sand & Stone Company, alleging that certain landowners of Pulaski County filed their petition in the county court of said county under the act approved March 4, 1907, praying for the formation of a road improvement district; that said court gave notice as required by said act of…

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The General Assembly of 1907 passed an act “to provide for the creation of improvement districts for the .building, constructing, maintaining and repairing of public roads in the State of Arkansas,” which was approved on the 4th of March, 1907, and applied to thirty-seven counties in the State. Pulaski County was one of the counties included in the act, and under its provisions the county court of Pulaski County created Road Improvement District No. 1, and -directors were elected, the benefits determined and assessments levied, and a contract was about to be let for the construction of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Walston v. NevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Duncan v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Lee Wilson & Co. v. William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Baker v. PaxtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Honea v. Federal Land Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API