Legal Opinion

Honea v. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1933No. 4-3140PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellants owned a tract of land, which was ordered sold under a decree of the Hempstead Chancery Court, foreclosing a mortgage thereon which they had given to appellee. There was a sale of the land as directed by the decree, and the report of the commissioner who had made the sale came on for confirmation at the ensuing term of the court. Appellants filed objections to the confirmation of the report reading as follows:

“The defendants admit the indebtedness, and admit the foreclosure decree was validly rendered, and the sale validly conducted, and that the plaintiff bid the full debt,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  2. Wightman v. KarsnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winston v. Personal Finance Co. of Pine Bluff, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Pope v. Shannon BrothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Wood v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Moran v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API