Legal Opinion
Otts v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 2008No. 04-CF-1139, 06-CO-1040PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
ORDER
On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is granted as set forth in the amended opinion filed April 23, 2008, and that this court’s opinion filed on September 13, 2007, is hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot, without prejudice to the filing of a petition for rehearing en banc directed to the amended opinion issued on April 23, 2008.
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Andre Otts, was charged with distributing a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Perez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hampleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Euceda v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.