Legal Opinion

Dalzell v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1932No. Nos. 12333, 12447, 12442, 12426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH,. District Judge,

These four suits have been duly tried together, as the causes of action arose from the same accident and the material facts, so far as the liability, if any, of the parties is sought to be shown, are the same in each ease.

Libelant Dalzell is the managing owner of the tug Britannia, who sues on his own behalf and on behalf of his co-owners who are set forth in the testimony. This tug, while on her way from the Battery to Pier 95, North River, was collided with by respondent’s steamer Coahoma County, and sunk,

Libelants Keene and Larsen represent members of the crew of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. The M. J. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Long Island R. v. KillienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Publicover v. Alcoa S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Societa Anonima Navigazione Alta Italia v. Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Jett v. Texas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  4. Societa Anonima Navigazione Altz Italia, Owner and of the Steamship the Mongioia v. Oil Transport Company, Inc., Etc., Societa Anonima Navigazione Alta Italia, Libelant v. Oil Transport Company, Inc., Etc., Societa Anonima Navigazione Alta Italia v. A & O Towing Company and the Tug RayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API