Legal Opinion

Hellums v. Reinhardt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 1990No. 88-1454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a judgment of the probate court admitting the will of Lela Mae Sherman to probate and holding that her husband, Clarence Hellums, was not entitled to an intestate share in her estate as an omitted spouse, Ala. Code 1975, §43-8-90, but was entitled only to an elective share, § 43-8-70. Hellums argues that the trial court did not properly apply the test for determining whether an omitted spouse is entitled to an intestate share and that, under the proper test, the evidence entitled him to such a share. The appellees, who are the beneficiaries of Sherman's will, contend that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of TaggartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Matter of Estate of BeamanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Matter of Estate of KnudsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Estate of Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kemp v. KroutterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Becraft v. BecraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. STATE INS. DEPT. v. HowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Edward S. Ferguson V v. Katina Helen Hawe CritopoulosSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Wester v. BakerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Kellam v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API