Legal Opinion

In re Taylor

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 16, 1968No. 67-BK-152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and JUDGMENT

DALTON, Chief Judge.

The bankrupt, Curtis Lee Taylor, is alleged by the objecting creditor, the Piedmont Trust Bank, to have committed acts which, under the provisions of section 14(c) of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C. § 32(e), require this court to deny his discharge in bankruptcy. In particular, the Piedmont Bank alleges that the bankrupt (1) “while engaged in business as a sole proprietor * * * obtained for such business money or property on credit or as an extension or renewal of credit by making or publishing * * * a materially false statement in writing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Banks v. Siegel. Matter of BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. In re FinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Gilmer v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nocera v. LemboSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API