Legal Opinion

State v. Trull

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. 04-705PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Bill Wilbur Trull appeals his jury conviction of felony aggravated assault. He argues that his conviction should be overturned and the charges dismissed because terms used in the aggravated assault statute are unconstitutionally vague. He also moved for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel and alleged peijury by the victim of his admitted assault. The District Court denied each motion. We affirm.

ISSUES

¶2 A restatement of the issues on appeal is:

¶3 Did the District Court err in denying Trull’s motion for a new trial based on the alleged peijured testimony of the man he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. WeldeleMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. GreenoMontana Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. StockMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re T.S.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Oberson v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AnkenyMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. Harley HowardMontana Supreme Court · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API