Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Heckler

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-0273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERMAN, District Judge.

Before this court is a motion for attorney fees and costs by plaintiff and his counsel for the counsel’s services in pursuing plaintiff’s social security disability action. Because we believe that neither party has adequately addressed or briefed the statutory bases for plaintiff’s motion, we will set forth the applicable legal standards and apply them to this action.

I. APPLICABLE LAW

A. Social Security Act

Two statutory methods, which are not mutually exclusive, exist by which the attorney of a successful social security disability claimant can obtain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the Navy, Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Edward Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Sidney E. Dawson v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Cunningham v. City of McKeesportCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Losco v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Lovell v. HecklerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Tomallo v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Bailey v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sanzari v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API