Bailey v. Heckler
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
I
Plaintiff, Earl J. Bailey, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Summary judgment subsequently was entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant.
Presently before the Court is a petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff’s counsel, Gilbert E. Caroff, Esquire. For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be denied, without prejudice.
II
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) provides in pertinent part that:
Whenev…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Skelton v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Howard v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Tomallo v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Matter v. BowenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987