Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Heckler

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-2666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

I

Plaintiff, Earl J. Bailey, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Summary judgment subsequently was entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant.

Presently before the Court is a petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff’s counsel, Gilbert E. Caroff, Esquire. For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be denied, without prejudice.

II

42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) provides in pertinent part that:

Whenev…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skelton v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Howard v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  3. Tomallo v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Matter v. BowenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API