Legal Opinion

Tomallo v. Heckler

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-1482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

I

Plaintiff, James Tomallo, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Summary judgment subsequently was entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant.

Presently before the Court is a petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff’s counsel of record, Robert N. Peirce, Jr., on his own behalf and on behalf of the law firm of Barkan & Neff, which served as “of counsel.”

II

42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) provides in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Seybold v. Francis P. Dean, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Matter v. BowenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Schupbach v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
  5. Bollenbacher v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API