Tomallo v. Heckler
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
I
Plaintiff, James Tomallo, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Summary judgment subsequently was entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant.
Presently before the Court is a petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff’s counsel of record, Robert N. Peirce, Jr., on his own behalf and on behalf of the law firm of Barkan & Neff, which served as “of counsel.”
II
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) provides in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. Of Philadelphia v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Seybold v. Francis P. Dean, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Matter v. BowenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Schupbach v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Bollenbacher v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990