Legal Opinion
Finton J. Phelan, Jr. v. People of the Territory of Guam
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1968No. 21747PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Finton J. Phelan, appellant, an attorney, was appointed out of the panel of attorneys of the district for the Territory of Guam, pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3006, to represent Edward D. Rosario. Rosario, 19 years old, was on trial on seven counts of forging and uttering checks drawn on certain Guam banks, in violation of the Penal Code of Guam.
The facts pertinent to the instant problem, as related in Rosario v. People of Territory of Guam, 9 Cir., 391 F.2d 869, decided March 13, 1968, were that about 8:00 A.M. on October 29, 1966, Juan T. Bias, the Commissioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- In the Matter of Wm. Bryan Osborne, ContemnorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Edward D. Rosario v. People of the Territory of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of Hipp, Inc., Debtor. Thomas J. Griffith, Trustee v. David OlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Lindsey v. Cryts (In Re Cox Cotton Co.)District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
- People of the Territory of Guam v. Concepcion OkadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Muskus v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972