Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1934No. 5178Published

1DissentStraup, Chief Justice

I am inclined to the view that the case mainly is one in equity. Whether a case is one at law or in equity is chiefly determined by the character of the pleadings. The plaintiff in a first count alleged that he was the owner and in possession of a particularly described parcel of land; that he since 1910, and at the commencement of the action, was also the owner of an easement or right of way over a particularly described parcel of land of the defendants; that for more than twenty years prior to the commencement of the action he and his predecessors in interest continously, uninterruptedly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kinsman v. Utah Gas & Coke Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wey v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Madsen v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Trenchard Et Ux. v. ReayUtah Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API