Legal Opinion

Kinsman v. Utah Gas & Coke Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1918No. 3054PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County,' Third District; Hon. T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by Hattie G. Kinsman and others against the Utah Gas & Coke Company. Decree for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

Plaintiffs, fifty-nine in number, by this action seek to enjoin the defendant from operating its gas plant at its location in the Western part of Salt Lake City.

*12Plaintiffs are residents and owners of property in tlie immediate vicinity of the gas plant. The residences are located within a radius of 132 to 800 feet from said plant. It is alleged that in the operation of the gas plant cinders, smoke, obnoxious and poisonous gases are discharged on the premises of the plaintiffs, and as a result the air is polluted and made poisonous to such an extent as to cause great inconvenience to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Thackery v. Union Portland Cement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Valley Mortuary v. FairbanksUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ludlow v. Colorado Animal By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API