Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1982No. 46726Published

1DissentBrachtenbach, C.J.

(dissenting) — Before examining the applicable law, it is necessary to review the facts, some of which are glossed over by the majority.

I

The plaintiff is John Cogan as personal representative of the Banchero estate. Cogan is an experienced lawyer, knowledgeable in real estate matters. He had been trying to sell the Banchero property for several years prior to the events which are the focus of this case; he had contacted *669many brokers and had advertised the sale, but his efforts had not produced a single offer at any price.

Several factors made this property difficult to sell. The market was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hardy v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API