Dysart v. Remington Rand, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtClark, Circuit Judge
(sitting as District Judge pursuant to statutory designation).
As the finding herewith indicates, the questions whether Birney Dysart was the original inventor and owner of the automatic credit balance invention here in issue and whether the Dalton Company agreed to pay for its use are basic and crucial. But these are issues of fact, and the evidence to my mind settles them in plaintiffs’ favor beyond doubt. The declarations, written and oral, of Dysart, admissible under Conn.Gen.Stat.1930, § 5608, as amended, Supp.1939, § 1408e, are too detailed, complete, circumstantial, and natural to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- O'CONNOR v. LudlamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Burton v. Burton Stock Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- White Heat Products Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- McNamara v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bush v. Remington Rand, Inc. Bush v. Remington Rand, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Dellefield v. Blockdel Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Banner Metals, Inc. v. LockwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- International Industries, Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- General Time Corp. v. Padua Alarm Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952