Singer v. Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, the briefs and the argument of appellees' counsel.
In January 1987. council members for defendant-appellant, The City of Cincinnati (City), enacted an ordinance forbidding the "owning," "keeping," or "harboring" of pit bull terriers in Cincinnati. Plaintiffs-appellants, Rochelle Singer and Richard Foreman, owners and breeders of registered American Staffordshire Terriers, a type of bull specifically banned by the ordinance, sought a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dias v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Cleveland v. IsaacsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lima v. StepletonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.