Legal Opinion

Miami-Dade County v. Thomasena Mitchell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2015No. 1D14-1446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer challenges the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) determination that it failed to sufficiently rebut the presumption of occupational causation afforded Claimant, a law enforcement officer, under section 112.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). The Employer argues that the JCC ignored or overlooked parts of the medical opinion testimony when he concluded that Claimant’s slow pathway accessory was not a congenital condition. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the Employer’s second issue on appeal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank Special v. West Boca Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Punsky v. Clay County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Fuller v. Okaloosa Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. City of Temple Terrace v. BaileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomasena Mitchell v. Miami Dade County aka MDPD (Intracoastal) etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. City of Jacksonville v. RatliffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. John F. Crittenden and Laurie B. Crittenden v. Reginald H. Tumlin, Jr., Ronald G. Tumlin and Reginald H. Tumlin as Successor Trustee of the Georgie H. Terwillegar Revocable Living TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. Village Center Community Development District v. IlleckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API