Legal Opinion

City of Jacksonville v. Ratliff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 13, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D15-5844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, M.K., J.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) challenges an order awarding the Claimant, a firefighter, entitlement to compensability of his heart condition and related medical treatment under the “heart-lung” statute, section 112.18, Florida Statutes (2014). The Claimant did not appeal the JCC’s denial of compensability of an alleged hypertension condition. We affirm in result because we find the E/C failed to sustain its burden of proof in one respect, but write to clarify application of section 112.18(1) regarding the shifting burdens of proof and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. In Re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Appl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. WarfelSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Aiello v. Knoll Golf ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Caldwell v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenneth Lakatis v. Citrus County Sheriff's Office/Florida Sheriff's Risk Management Fund (FSRMF)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  2. Seminole County, Florida and Johns Eastern Company, Inc. v. BradenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API