City of Jacksonville v. Ratliff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, M.K., J.
In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) challenges an order awarding the Claimant, a firefighter, entitlement to compensability of his heart condition and related medical treatment under the “heart-lung” statute, section 112.18, Florida Statutes (2014). The Claimant did not appeal the JCC’s denial of compensability of an alleged hypertension condition. We affirm in result because we find the E/C failed to sustain its burden of proof in one respect, but write to clarify application of section 112.18(1) regarding the shifting burdens of proof and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- In Re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Appl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. WarfelSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Aiello v. Knoll Golf ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Caldwell v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenneth Lakatis v. Citrus County Sheriff's Office/Florida Sheriff's Risk Management Fund (FSRMF)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Seminole County, Florida and Johns Eastern Company, Inc. v. BradenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023