Legal Opinion

Punsky v. Clay County Sheriff's Office

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2009No. 1D07-3901PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for consideration appellees’ Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and Certification. We deny the motion for certification, but grant the motion for rehearing, and hear this case en banc in order to harmonize our case law. We withdraw the panel decision of July 21, 2008, Punsky v. Clay County Sheriff’s Office, 33 Fla. L. Weekly D1820 (Fla. 1st DCA July 21, 2008), and substitute the following opinion.

Appellant, Robert Punsky, the claimant below, seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm the order, because,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. ValcinSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Caldwell v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Andrews v. CBS DIVISION, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Punsky v. Clay County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Fuller v. Okaloosa Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Walters v. State-DOC/Division of Risk ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Miami-Dade County v. Thomasena MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Gonzalez v. St. Lucie County-Fire District/Florida Municipal Insurance Trust-Florida League of Cities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API