In re F.G.J. & M.G.J.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Respondent mother and respondent father appeal from the trial court’s orders terminating their parental rights to F.G.J. (“Fred”) and *682M.G.J. (“Molly”).1 The trial court concluded that grounds existed to terminate respondents’ parental rights under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(2) and § 7B-1111(a)(7) (2007). We agree with respondents’ arguments that the trial court’s findings of fact are inconsistent with its conclusion under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(7) that they abandoned their children. We, therefore, reverse the order below to the extent it rests on § 7B-1111(a)(7). As to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- In Re Adoption of SearleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- In Re ShepardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re: J.M. & J.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In Re FGJCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re A.M.A.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- In re B.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.