In re: J.M. & J.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Chief Judge.
*484 Respondent-Father appeals from an adjudication, disposition, and permanency planning order concluding that his son, J.M. ("the son"), was an abused juvenile; that his daughter, J.M. ("the daughter"), was a seriously neglected juvenile (together, "the children"); that it was in the children's best interests to remain in the custody of the Durham County Department of Social Services ("DSS"); and that DSS was not required *485 to employ reasonable reunification efforts with Respondent-Father. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part, and vacate in part.
I. Background
DSS filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- In re T.H.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re: M.T-L.Y.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- In re B.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- In re J.M. & J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- In re J.M. and J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.