Legal Opinion

In re: J.M. & J.M.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 2017No. COA17-275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Chief Judge.

*484 Respondent-Father appeals from an adjudication, disposition, and permanency planning order concluding that his son, J.M. ("the son"), was an abused juvenile; that his daughter, J.M. ("the daughter"), was a seriously neglected juvenile (together, "the children"); that it was in the children's best interests to remain in the custody of the Durham County Department of Social Services ("DSS"); and that DSS was not required *485 to employ reasonable reunification efforts with Respondent-Father. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part, and vacate in part.

I. Background

DSS filed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  4. In re T.H.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re: M.T-L.Y.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. In re B.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. In re J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  4. In re J.M. & J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  5. In re J.M. and J.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API