Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1971No. 60PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Defendant contends the State failed to offer substantial evidence that defendant shared in the criminal intent of the actual perpetrators, and that this is one of the material elements needed to convict defendant for aiding and abetting.

Intent is an attitude or emotion of the mind, and is seldom, if ever, susceptible of proof by direct evidence. It must ordinarily be proven by facts and circumstances from which it may be inferred. State v. Arnold, 264 N.C. 348, 141 S.E. 2d 473; State…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API