Legal Opinion
Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Federal Power Commission, Northern Natural Gas Co., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 15, 1964No. 17717PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURGER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, Mid-America Pipeline Company, seeks review of an order of the Federal Power Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act 1 granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Northern Natural Gas Company, Intervenor, to construct and operate facilities for natural gas transmission. This order also disclaimed certificate jurisdiction over an extraction plant constructed by Northern Gas Products Company (Products Company) adjacent to the certificated pipeline of Northern. The challenged order was issued December 28, 1962; Mid-America sought…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City Of Pittsburgh v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- City of Detroit v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- City of Pittsburgh v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966