Legal Opinion

Sievert v. Selvig

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1928No. 26,933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, C.

A default judgment was entered against defendant in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis. Defendant moved to vacate the judgment on the ground that “said judgment is wholly null and void.” The motion was denied and defendant appeals.

The action Avas commenced by service of a summons and complaint. The summons was entitled: “State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, Municipal Court, City of Minneapolis.” It was in all respects regular in form as a summons in municipal court. It required the defendant to serve a copy of his answer on the plaintiff’s attorneys within ten days…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrow v. WeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KaufertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Lee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Francis v. KnerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Millette v. MehmkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Schultz v. OldenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Coman v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of StenzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API