Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Hedrick

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1995No. 95-89PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Dan Hedrick (husband) appeals from the disposition of marital property by the district court. Husband claims that either the court abused its discretion or that it committed a technical error which this court should correct when it divided the equity in the parties’ home.

We affirm.

Husband presents two issues for review:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in the division of the parties’ equity in their home.

2. Whether the trial court made a technical error which does not necessarily amount to an abuse of discretion but which should be corrected by the Supreme Court.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Warren v. WarrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Neuman v. NeumanWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lund v. LundWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. France v. FranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Barton v. BartonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dmm v. DfhWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API