Legal Opinion

Hastings v. City of Bremerton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1930No. 22635. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— Plaintiff Glolden Rule Bakery is a corporation engaged in business in the city of Seattle as a baker, its products being distributed in that city and adjacent territory by agents who solicit patronage and who sell and deliver its bread and similar food stuffs from house to house, using motor trucks which follow regular routes. It employs fifty or sixty of these distributing agents, two of whom, plaintiffs Hastings and Johnson, were handling its business in the city of Bremerton.

March 27, 1930, ordinance No. 910 of defendant city of Bremerton, a municipal corporation of the second class,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Town of Sumner v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Thayer v. Snohomish Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Swan v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. Pacific American FisheriesWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. McKenzie v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API