Legal Opinion
State v. Pacific American Fisheries
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1913No. 10534PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered February 3, 1912, upon a trial and conviction of a violation of the eight hour day law.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The defendant was charged by information with employing a female person for more than eight hours in one day. The information, so far as material to the present inquiry, is as follows:
“Then and there, being on or about October 20, 1911, the said defendant, Pacific American Fisheries', a corporation, did then and there wilfully and unlawfully employ a female, to wit: Mrs. E. B. Scrimscher, for more than eight hours out of the twenty-four hours of said 20th day of October, 1911, to wit: for a period of ten consecutive hours, save and except one hour intermission between 12 and 1 o’clock of said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Swan v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JakubowskiWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Donnely v. Mavar Shrimp & Oyster Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. CrothersWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Hastings v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.