Legal Opinion

State v. Pacific American Fisheries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913No. 10534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered February 3, 1912, upon a trial and conviction of a violation of the eight hour day law.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendant was charged by information with employing a female person for more than eight hours in one day. The information, so far as material to the present inquiry, is as follows:

“Then and there, being on or about October 20, 1911, the said defendant, Pacific American Fisheries', a corporation, did then and there wilfully and unlawfully employ a female, to wit: Mrs. E. B. Scrimscher, for more than eight hours out of the twenty-four hours of said 20th day of October, 1911, to wit: for a period of ten consecutive hours, save and except one hour intermission between 12 and 1 o’clock of said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Swan v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JakubowskiWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Donnely v. Mavar Shrimp & Oyster Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. CrothersWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hastings v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API