Thayer v. Snohomish Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered May 15, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages for a horse killed by a railway train.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The action is one to recover damages, and the appeal is taken upon the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. Appellant assigns three *459errors: (1) that the conclusions of law do not follow from the findings of fact and are not supported thereby; (2) that the judgment is not supported by the findings of fact; (3) that the conclusions of law and judgment are not supported by the findings of fact.
In the complaint the negligence charged against the respondent is set forth in paragraph 4 as follows:
‘ ‘ That on or about the 5th day of July, 1916, the said horse, because of the neglect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Jimerson v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Knight v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Young v. St. Louis, K. C. & N. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ayers v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Walker-Taylor Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Archibald v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Lydig Construction, Inc. v. Rainier National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.