Monroe v. Paddock
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Starke Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The appellants were the makers of two promissory notes, payable to the order of Gallup & Peabody, and to secure the payment thereof they mortgaged land to Paddock, as trustee. The notes being due and unpaid, Paddock, as trustee, brought suit upon them and the mortgage, and obtained a judgment, from which this appeal was taken. The appellants assign four errors, to wit:
“First. The court erred in defaulting the defendants on the return day of the summons, the fourth day of the term, at the morning call of the docket.
“Second. The court erred in permitting the defendants to be…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCoy v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Womack v. McahrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Bristor v. GalvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hunter v. FrancisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholson v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. FlinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kerr v. HaverstickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Gwinner v. Gary Connecting Railways Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Citizens Loan & Trust Co. v. BoylesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.