Legal Opinion

In Re Manicure

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 15, 1983No. 16-70549PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. CLYDE PEARSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes on upon the filing by CIT Corporation, a creditor, of objections to exemptions claimed by the respective Debtors, James Edward Manicure and Harold Loyd Ringley. After a joint hearing on the objections in the cases, the Court makes the following determination.

In October 1974, Manicure and Ringley formed a partnership under the name of Ringley and Mancuso Coal Producers. The partnership engaged in the coal operation business and operated several strip mines in the vicinity of Wise County, Virginia. The business experienced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Oliver v. GivensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  4. Smith v. ColemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  5. Bass v. Thacker (In Re Thacker)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. 16 Collier bankr.cas.2d 702, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,754 in Re K.C. MacHine & Tool Company, Debtor, June E. Morgan, Trustee the Detroit Edison Company Dery & Dery, P.C. Hill, Lewis, Adams, Goodrich & Tait v. K.C. MacHine & Tool Company, City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re MasseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  3. In Re ZellaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  4. Morgan v. K.C. Machine & Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Wolfe v. SprouseDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API