Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 5, 2016No. Criminal No. 2005-0002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
Defendant Xavier Valentine Brown, proceeding pro se, filed a motion, on January 15, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), for the return of personal property and cash allegedly seized from him by Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents at the time of his arrest on January 6, 2005. Def.’s Petition for Return of Prop. Pursuant to Fed. R. of Crim. P. 41(g) by Way of Affidavit by Xavier Valentine Brown (“Defi’s Pet.”) ¶ 4, ECF No. 149. 1 In response, the government has returned some of the items seized, denies seizing some…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Hammed Adeleke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cumis Ins. Soc'y, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barnes v. NewshamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Cumis Insurance Society Inc v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Ford-Bey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. ChansleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.